Versionen im Vergleich

Schlüssel

  • Diese Zeile wurde hinzugefügt.
  • Diese Zeile wurde entfernt.
  • Formatierung wurde geändert.
Kommentar: zurückgeholt von v. 94

...

Depending on the /wiki/spaces/PUB/pages/425995, the main proposal has to satisfy a prescribed layout:

Proposal type

Whitelist status

To gain whitelist status one needs to upload the proposal and acceptance of one of the funding institutions BMBF, DFG, EU, NHR, or GCS.

Proposal layoutIncluded content

Initial

nolayout sample
  • scientific part
  • technical part

yes

layout sample
  • technical part

Follow-up

yes or nolayout sample
  • scientific part (brief update) and reference to the initial proposal
  • technical part
Generally, please avoid:
  • Imprecise or incomprehensible estimation of requested computational resources (especially core-hours); for example, missing arguments to justify a certain number of N runs instead of a smaller number. One page is our recommended minimum.
  • No proof, that the software to be used is suitable and efficient for parallel execution (and parallel I/O) on our current HPC systems architecture. Recycling a scalability demo by a third party is meaningless, without showing that your planned production run is fully comparable to it (algorithm selection within the software, I/O pattern, machine architecture, problem size per core).
  • The overall aim and/or motivation behind the project is unclear.
  • The applicant lacks HPC/Unix skills and an experienced co-applicant is missing.
  • Insufficiency of the applicant's local resources is not indicated.
  • The NHR and/or HLRN was not mentioned in relevant publications.
  • Cut & paste of previous proposals.

...